School Board · Special Called Meeting · May 21, 2026

Thu, May 21, 2026

Hickman County Board of Education meetings, including regular sessions and special called meetings.

Outline

Disclaimer:
This outline was created using AI based on an automatically generated transcript. The transcript and this outline is likely to contain errors, inaccuracies, or omissions. Always refer to the original audio recording if you need to verify any details or for official purposes.

Call to Order

  • The special called meeting was called to order after preliminary audio and setup.
  • The board observed a moment of silence and recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

Agenda and Attendance

  • A motion was made and seconded to approve the agenda, but attendance was taken before proceeding.
  • Four board members were present, with three absent, and a quorum was declared.
  • The main business item was the school budget.

Budget Background

  • The board discussed the need to return to the county commission on Tuesday with a budget after prior submissions had been rejected.
  • The board had originally discussed a 13-cent increase, then presented an 8-cent version to the county commission.
  • The county commission rejected the 8-cent version and recommended 4 cents; the board then approved the 4-cent recommendation, but the county commission later rejected that budget as well.
  • The latest county commission counter discussed at the meeting appeared to reduce the property tax increase from 4 cents to 2 cents and lower the local option sales tax estimate to about $3.1 million.
  • The 2-cent reduction was described as reducing school revenues by roughly $166,000 to $168,000 compared with the 4-cent version.

Maintenance of Effort and Revenue Discussion

  • Members discussed how sales tax affects maintenance of effort differently from actual revenue collected.
  • It was stated that sales tax revenue depends on where and how much people purchase, not simply on what is budgeted.
  • The school system receives 50% of local option sales tax collected in the county.
  • Property tax was described as budgeted at 93% of collectible property tax, while actual collection is usually closer to 100%.
  • The 2025-2026 sales tax amended estimate was discussed as about $2.975 million against a $3.1 million figure, with current estimates ranging from about $3.4 million to $3.6 million.

Staffing and Operational Concerns

  • Discussion emphasized that each penny of property tax was roughly equivalent to about two positions.
  • Staff reductions were described as likely regardless of the final budget outcome because multiple schools had more positions than the funding formula supported.
  • Board members expressed concern about cutting teachers, aides, nurses, and other support staff, especially because of student safety and health needs.
  • It was stated that no new positions were believed to be included in the budget.
  • The board discussed past efforts to handle staff reductions through attrition, while acknowledging that reductions without attrition may become necessary if revenues do not improve.
  • Personnel costs were repeatedly identified as the school system's largest cost.

Capital and Cost Pressures

  • The county commission had also discussed one-year maintenance capital outlay funding of about $405,000.
  • A capital list of about $435,000 was discussed, including tennis court resurfacing at both ends of the county, a roof item, and intermediate school playground fencing.
  • Members discussed how capital projects were historically handled differently and noted that capital funding does not solve the operating budget deficit.
  • Rising costs were cited, including buses increasing from about $92,000 in 2020 to about $147,000 currently.
  • Declining enrollment was discussed as a major revenue challenge, with an estimated 500 to 600 fewer students at roughly $7,000 each, or about $4 million.

Budget Motions and Votes

  • A motion was made to accept a budget with a 2-cent property tax increase plus $405,000 in capital outlay.
  • The 2-cent motion died for lack of a second.
  • A second motion was made and seconded to approve a 4-cent property tax increase with the current $405,000 capital outlay.
  • The 4-cent motion passed by roll call vote, with all present members voting yes.

Sales Tax Estimate Vote

  • After the 4-cent property tax motion passed, the board discussed whether the local option sales tax estimate also needed to be adjusted.
  • It was stated that leaving sales tax at $3.3 million would essentially send back the same budget previously rejected.
  • A motion was made and seconded to move the 2026-2027 sales tax estimate to $3.1 million.
  • The sales tax estimate motion passed by roll call vote, with all present members voting yes.
  • With the $3.1 million sales tax estimate and 4-cent property tax increase, the maintenance of effort increase was described as about 8.28%.

Budget-Neutral Scenario Presentation

  • A board member presented a simplified "household budget" explanation of what it would take for the school system to reach a budget-neutral position.
  • The presentation said Hickman County receives about 16% to 18% of its school budget from local government, compared with a Tennessee county average of nearly 40%, placing Hickman County in the bottom 25%.
  • Projected revenues were described as about $32.5 million, while estimated expenditures were about $38.5 million, creating a roughly $6 million deficit.
  • The deficit was compared to roughly $6 million in state-mandated pay raises and increases that had not been matched by funding.
  • Increasing the sales tax forecast from about $3 million to $3.6 million was described as adding about $600,000.
  • A 4-cent property tax increase was described as adding about $350,000 and bringing projected revenue to about $33.5 million.
  • A scenario involving a 10% budget cut, roughly $4 million, plus closing two schools was described as saving about $1 million to $1.2 million and producing about a $200,000 surplus before capital projects.
  • Capital projects were described as historically costing about $750,000 to $1 million annually, meaning the scenario would still become negative after capital needs.
  • The operating budget was described as about 70% to 75% personnel, or $27 million to $29 million, with operating costs at about 25% to 30%, or roughly $9.5 million to $11.5 million.
  • The presentation emphasized that the board mainly controls cuts to jobs and possible school closures, while revenue sources such as sales tax, TISA, and county-approved property tax are outside direct board control.

Fund Balance and State Oversight Risk

  • Operational fund balance was discussed as about $9.76 million in 2023-2024, $9.57 million in 2024-2025, and $8.29 million in 2025-2026.
  • The fund balance was said to have dropped by almost $1.3 million from 2024-2025 to 2025-2026.
  • The legal minimum balance was discussed as 3% of the budget, or about $1.2 million.
  • Comptroller guidance was discussed, with two months of operating costs corrected to about $6.3 million.
  • The board discussed concern that, if the fund balance reaches the state minimum, the state could step in and tell the district how to operate and set the tax rate.
  • At the current rate, reaching the state minimum was described as possibly about two years away.

Additional Revenue Ideas

  • A possible $50 wheel tax was mentioned as an example that could add about $1 million.
  • Members discussed increasing online enrollment or bringing students back into the school system as another possible revenue strategy.
  • One member estimated that filling the roughly $6 million gap through maintenance of effort alone could require about 70 to 72 cents.

County Commission Timeline and Legal Questions

  • The board discussed that it was not on the regular county commission agenda and that the county commission would need to amend its agenda to consider the school budget.
  • Members asked what happens if the county commission rejects the budget again.
  • It was stated that, as understood from the law, the county commission can reject the budget and send it back with suggested numbers, and the school board may have 10 days to respond.
  • Members discussed the need for legal clarification about Act of 1981 budgeting rules and county commission authority.
  • CTAS had been contacted, and members also discussed reaching out to Ben Torres, the school attorney, and other legal resources.
  • Board members were encouraged to read the full law and not only highlighted sections.
  • It was noted that the special called meeting had to be arranged quickly, with roughly 30 minutes to make the decision to call it.

Adjournment

  • After budget, sales tax, timeline, and legal-process discussions, a motion was made and seconded to adjourn.
  • The meeting adjourned by voice vote.

Key figures and statistics

Figure Type Context / topic
4 members present Count Quorum for special called meeting
3 members absent Count Attendance
May 7, 2026 Date Prior budget committee/county commission recommendation discussion
May 11, 2026 Date Prior county commission rejection referenced
Tuesday Date / deadline Deadline to return to county commission with budget
13 cents Rate Original property tax increase discussed by board
8 cents Rate First budget version presented to county commission
4 cents Rate County commission recommendation later approved by board
2 cents Rate Latest county commission counter discussed
$166,000 Dollar amount Approximate reduction from 4 cents to 2 cents, as first stated
$168,000 Dollar amount Approximate additional revenue reduction from 4 cents to 2 cents, as later stated
About two positions per penny Count / estimate Staffing impact of each property tax penny
6% Percentage Maintenance of effort increase discussed with 2-cent/property-tax and sales-tax assumptions
11% Percentage Earlier maintenance of effort increase referenced for comparison
50% Percentage School system share of local option sales tax
93% Percentage Property tax budgeted share of collectible property tax
Close to 100% Percentage Typical actual property tax collection discussed
$2.975 million Dollar amount 2025-2026 sales tax amended estimate discussed
$3.1 million Dollar amount Lower local option sales tax estimate and later approved 2026-2027 estimate
$3.3 million Dollar amount Prior sales tax estimate in the earlier budget
$3.4 million to $3.6 million Dollar amount Estimated current sales tax range discussed
About $3.5 million Dollar amount Lower sales tax estimate attributed to Crystal
About $3.6 million Dollar amount Higher sales tax estimate discussed
$405,000 Dollar amount Current capital outlay included with approved 4-cent motion
$435,000 Dollar amount Capital project list discussed
$400,000-plus Dollar amount Capital projects amount described in discussion
$4 million to $500,000 / $4 to $500,000 Dollar amount Garbled transcript reference to capital outlay; context indicates about $400,000 to $500,000
$83,969 per penny Dollar amount Approximate value of each property tax penny
About 7 cents Rate Comparison of 2-cent increase plus capital money as "money-wise" equivalent
8 votes Count Number of county commission votes one commissioner believed could be secured
$92,000 Dollar amount Cost of a bus in 2020
$147,000 Dollar amount Current bus cost discussed
20 years Time period Age cycle for roofs after new high school opened
500 to 600 students Count Enrollment decrease discussed
At least $7,000 per student Dollar amount Revenue impact estimate per student
About $4 million Dollar amount Approximate revenue impact of enrollment decrease
8.28% Percentage Maintenance of effort increase after 4 cents and $3.1 million sales tax estimate
Nearly 40% Percentage Average county local-government share of school budget cited from TSBA information
16% to 18% Percentage Hickman County local-government share of school budget
Bottom 25% Percentage / ranking Hickman County position among Tennessee counties for local funding
$32.5 million Dollar amount Projected revenue in budget-neutral presentation
$38.5 million Dollar amount Estimated expenditures in budget-neutral presentation
About $6 million deficit Dollar amount Projected deficit
About $6 million Dollar amount Approximate state-mandated pay raises/increases referenced
About $3 million to $3.6 million Dollar amount Sales tax forecast increase scenario
$0.6 million Dollar amount Revenue added by increasing sales tax forecast from about $3 million to $3.6 million
About $0.35 million Dollar amount Revenue from 4-cent property tax increase, as stated in presentation
$33.5 million Dollar amount Revenue after sales tax forecast and 4-cent increase scenario
10% Percentage Hypothetical budget cut scenario
$3.85 million Dollar amount Ten percent cut amount before rounding
$4 million Dollar amount Rounded cut amount in budget-neutral scenario
2 schools Count Closure scenario discussed
$1 million to $1.2 million Dollar amount Estimated savings from closing two schools
$33.3 million Dollar amount Resulting expenditure/revenue figure in closure-and-cut scenario
About $200,000 surplus Dollar amount Projected surplus before capital projects in scenario
$750,000 to $1 million per year Dollar amount Historical annual capital projects cost
70% to 75% Percentage Personnel share of budget
$27 million to $29 million Dollar amount Personnel cost estimate
25% to 30% Percentage Operating cost share of budget
$9.5 million to $11.5 million Dollar amount Operating cost estimate as heard
$1 million to $2 million deficit Dollar amount Deficit range referenced during personnel/operations discussion
$9.76 million Dollar amount Operational fund balance for 2023-2024, as heard
$9.57 million Dollar amount Operational fund balance for 2024-2025
$8.29 million Dollar amount Operational fund balance for 2025-2026
Almost $1.3 million Dollar amount Fund balance decrease from 2024-2025 to 2025-2026
3% Percentage Legal minimum fund balance
About $1.2 million Dollar amount Approximate legal minimum fund balance
Two months Time period Comptroller minimum operating reserve recommendation
$3.7 million Dollar amount Initially stated two-month reserve/monthly operating cost figure, later corrected
$6.3 million Dollar amount Corrected two-month operating reserve figure
Four to six months Time period Comptroller preferred operating reserve range discussed
About $7 million Dollar amount Initial four-month reserve estimate before correction
$10.4 million Dollar amount Initial six-month reserve estimate before correction
$12.6 million Dollar amount Four-month reserve after correction
$25 million Dollar amount Six-month reserve after correction, as stated
Two years Time period Estimated time before reaching state minimum if current trend continues
20 options Count Chess analogy for first move
400 options Count Chess analogy for second move
Over 5,000 options Count Chess analogy for third move
10 Commandments Count Analogy in budget-neutral presentation
11th commandment Count Analogy about not fooling oneself
$50 wheel tax Dollar amount Possible revenue idea
About $1 million Dollar amount Possible revenue from $50 wheel tax
70 to 72 cents Rate Estimated maintenance of effort increase needed to fill $6 million gap
10 days Time period Possible response period if county commission rejects budget
30 minutes Time period Time described for calling the special meeting