School Board · Meeting · Jul 8, 2024

Mon, Jul 8, 2024

Hickman County Board of Education meetings, including regular sessions and special called meetings.

This outline was generated by an LLM from a transcript and may contain errors or inaccuracies. Prefer the original recording when available.

The board handled a dense agenda centered on budget adjustments, staffing shortages, policy revisions, and school climate. Major actions included approving early-year budget amendments and closeout amendments, renewing student assessment and Medicaid-billing related contracts, declaring buses and other vehicles surplus, authorizing a backup virtual speech-therapy contract because of staffing shortages, approving school fees with hardship waivers, classifying bus drivers as full-time for immediate health-insurance eligibility, and approving a $5,000 contract raise for the director of schools after extended discussion over contract mechanics and equity with employee raises.

Board discussion also spent significant time on two broader issues: the annual civil rights / bullying report and TCAP results. Members questioned a sharp rise in reported bullying-related complaints, asked for clearer breakdowns and an action plan, and debated whether stronger discipline tools such as out-of-school suspension, Saturday school, or after-school detention may be needed. On academics, the district highlighted growth in 16 of 25 tested categories while still trailing the state average in most areas. Other notable threads included top-10 ranking policy changes, AI policy language, energy-drink restrictions, student board-member eligibility, TSBA policy updates from the legislative session, and a teacher-association email raising concerns about bullying and class size.

Approval of Minutes and Agenda 13:19

  • 13:19 Approved special-called meeting minutes from May 20; one member abstained due to absence.
  • 13:52 Approved regular meeting minutes from June 3 without opposition.
  • 14:18 Agenda amended before approval:
    • 14:44 Civil rights report pulled from consent and moved for separate discussion under board-action items.
    • 15:39 TCAP data discussion moved up from announcements into the main action/discussion section.
    • 16:29 Policy 1.26 added for action to waive a requirement tied to the student board representative.
  • 18:02 Amended agenda approved without opposition.

Special Recognitions 18:20

East Hickman High School student recognition 18:20

  • 18:36 East Hickman High School recognized a freshman student, corrected into the top-10 ranking after an earlier calculation oversight involving yearlong classes.
  • 18:50 Student was described as active in volleyball and HOSA, ranked 9th with a 96 average.

Bridge Builder award 19:47

  • 20:16 East Hickman High School students presented a Bridge Builder award to Mr. Hagens.

Employee of the Month 21:21

  • 21:21 Employee of the Month announced as Mike Elkins, praised as the central office “go-to guy”; he was absent due to illness.

Consent Agenda 22:26

  • 22:33 Consent agenda included the board chair report and miscellaneous countersigned documents.
  • 22:47 Consent agenda approved unanimously.

New Business / Agenda Items 23:07

Budget amendments 23:07

  • 23:21 Two initial budget amendments for the new year were presented in place of Finance Director Crystal Fitzgerald / Mike Elkins:
    • 23:29 Amendment #1 aligned revenue and expenditures for the Innovative School Model grant with the district’s actual plan.
    • 23:52 Amendment #2 corrected omitted budgeting for certain federal program funds.
  • 24:11 Motion to approve budget amendments 1 and 2; approved by roll call without opposition.

Closeout budget amendments 24:44

  • 24:44 Board reviewed already-approved closeout amendments 36–41 for information:
    • 24:44 Amendment 36: adjusted the GEAR UP / grant-related budget to add supervisor pay line funding.
    • 24:59 Amendment 37: adjusted CTE/Perkins line items to place funds where they could be spent.
    • 25:07 Amendment 38: covered maintenance issues and repairs by shifting money from other contracted services.
    • 25:23 Amendment 39: moved retirement benefit funds between state retirement and hybrid categories.
    • 25:38 Amendment 40: corrected prior processing confusion between amendments 32 and 35.
    • 26:02 Amendment 41: moved money in special education from insurance into travel for nurse travel expenses.
  • 26:26 No vote required; these were informational because the board had already authorized closeout flexibility.

School plant membership 26:49

  • 27:00 Board discussed a TSPMA / school plant-management membership item that had newly appeared on the agenda.
  • 27:18 Administration explained it supports school plant and facilities best practices, information sharing, and conferences for maintenance leadership.
  • 27:50 Motion made to approve the membership; approved by roll call.

MasteryConnect assessment quote 28:24

  • 28:32 Administration requested approval of a quote for MasteryConnect, funded with ESSER money, at $50,400; motion was framed as approval up to $51,000 payable to Instructure.
  • 28:58 Justification: benchmark/practice testing for students taking TCAP or end-of-course exams, used to identify instructional strengths and gaps.
  • 29:24 District explained students would take the assessment three times a year: beginning of year, middle of year, and in March before state testing.
  • 30:03 Board raised concern about test anxiety and whether students know it is a practice assessment.
  • 30:25 Response: repeated use reduces anxiety, familiarizes students with the format, and helps teachers and students use the data.
  • 30:58 Administration said reliability was about 95% to 98%, and the purchased bank would let teachers create standards-aligned quizzes and tests.
  • 31:48 Funding window discussion noted the contract needed to be in place by the end of September, with funds spent by year-end.
  • 32:21 Motion to approve up to $51,000 to Instructure for MasteryConnect; approved by roll call.

Stellar Therapy Services contract 33:05

  • 33:05 Administration requested renewal of the Stellar Therapy Services LLC agreement used since January to obtain Medicaid reimbursement for skilled nursing services provided to eligible students.
  • 33:47 Board clarified this is revenue-generating rather than a direct cost, though the vendor takes a share of collections.
  • 34:02 Administration said the district had been netting about $3,000 per month, projecting roughly $27,000 to $30,000 annually, with expectations for growth.
  • 34:18 Explanation for the public: when a Medicaid-eligible student receives covered nursing services, the district can bill Medicaid through the vendor process.
  • 34:43 Motion to approve renewal; approved by roll call.

Surplus property declaration 35:15

  • 35:24 Board considered declaration of surplus for five buses, three white fleet vehicles, and miscellaneous oil and fuel filters.
  • 35:43 Transportation director explained the buses were at end of life due to age, mileage, mechanical failure, or prior insurance total loss:
    • 35:52 Bus 101: 18 years old, 224,000 miles.
    • 36:00 Bus 12: 16 years old, would not start, compression issue; replacement engine not worth about $20,000.
    • 36:07 Bus 31: 16 years old, under 30,000 miles, but another compression issue with a problematic International engine.
    • 36:25 Bus 33: 122,000 miles, kingpin and body wear from county-road use.
    • 36:34 Bus 65: 17 years old, previously totaled by insurance and retained for parts.
  • 36:58 Motion to approve surplus property; approved by roll call.

Sidekick Therapy Partners agreement 37:29

  • 37:38 Administration requested approval of a contract with Sidekick Therapy Partners for speech-language therapy.
  • 37:45 Justification: the district was short a speech-language pathologist after a therapist retired or left for private practice, and must meet IEP-required service levels.
  • 38:23 Contract would provide services at $85 an hour; vendor would try to locate an in-person therapist for Hickman County, but otherwise provide virtual therapy.
  • 38:39 Administration emphasized not all students would be placed in virtual therapy; student selection would be made based on who could benefit.
  • 38:47 District said other districts had used the service favorably and that the contract served as a “safety net” to ensure compliance.
  • 39:57 Motion to approve the agreement; approved by roll call.

School fees 40:29

  • 40:36 Administration reported that the six lower schools have no routine school fees, though middle schools may have fees tied to field trips.
  • 40:45 Both high schools had similar fee schedules, including graduation-related and club-related fees; parking fee discussed separately.
  • 41:16 Administration said families with hardship could have fees waived, and that this would be communicated publicly and through handbooks/letters.
  • 41:33 Board asked whether the current fee structure should be reconsidered in the future; response was that the pattern was common and acceptable so long as fees do not prevent participation.
  • 42:25 Parking fees were discussed, reportedly $10 at both high schools, partly to share costs of parking-lot striping, which was said to be overdue especially at East Hickman High School.
  • 43:02 Board noticed cosmetology fees were not clearly listed and raised concern because supplies can be costly.
  • 44:18 Administration confirmed cosmetology fee should be $100 and should be consistent at both high schools; culinary had no fees.
  • 44:33 Motion to approve school fees; approved without opposition.

Discipline Hearing Authority committee 45:04

  • 45:13 Board approved annual membership for the Discipline Hearing Authority committee, which hears student discipline appeals under board policy.
  • 45:30 Recommended members named in the meeting materials were Beth Robinson, Jana Willis, Gavin Gordon, Tera Lawson, Allison Gilbert, and Shelley Claus; committee chaired by Ms. Malugin / Maluhan (unclear in transcript).
  • 45:45 Administration said the committee met more often than the year before, roughly 12 times, partly because one incident generated about six appeals.
  • 46:16 Discussion referenced a bus incident in which a student brought a vape and about six students participated and appealed discipline.
  • 46:42 Administration described a philosophical change in alternative-school assignments:
    • 46:51 Prior assignments as long as 180 days were considered excessive.
    • 47:16 Other districts were consulted; Dickson reportedly uses 50 days as its longest assignment.
    • 47:31 District had begun reviewing students around the 50% mark and reintegrating them at grading-period breaks if behavior and work improved.
    • 47:48 Administration said about 12 students benefited from this approach, with only one known recidivism case.
    • 48:38 The six students in the vape incident could return in the fall if conferences went well.
    • 48:55 Administration confirmed vaping on the bus also leads to juvenile-court consequences under Tennessee law.
  • 50:05 Motion to approve the committee; passed without opposition.

Bus drivers classified as full-time for insurance eligibility 50:19

  • 50:27 Administration asked the board to change bus-driver status so new bus drivers would not have to wait one year before receiving health insurance.
  • 50:37 Rationale: bus driving was described as the only district job with that waiting period; other districts reportedly do not impose it.
  • 51:12 Proposed solution was to declare bus drivers “full-time employees” for insurance purposes, following an approach used by another district.
  • 51:21 Immediate practical need: the district had three vacant bus routes and wanted immediate insurance access to help recruit drivers.
  • 52:44 Operational background:
    • A bus driver had passed away.
    • Another driver was no longer able to drive after legal issues.
    • Transportation then had to run double routes and occasionally skip routes.
  • 53:40 Administration said four or five people were in the pipeline to become drivers, but licensing and certification requirements were extensive.
  • 54:13 Double routes were described as harming instruction because some students arrived around 8:30–8:35 and missed about 30 minutes of first-period instruction; some afternoon riders left around 2:25 to make double runs work.
  • 55:49 Estimated budget impact was about $7,900 per employee for health insurance; discussion referenced roughly $23,700 if covering three new hires.
  • 56:13 Motion made to declare bus drivers full-time employees for this purpose; approved by roll call.

Director of Schools compensation / contract amendment 56:58

  • 57:19 Board clarified that the adopted budget alone did not grant a raise to the director of schools; his contract required a formal amendment.
  • 58:50 Board cited advice from TSBA that adjusting salary alone would be permissible even in an election year, while changes to contract length would not be.
  • 59:21 Context: other district employees had received a 4% raise plus, for many, a step increase; board members estimated many employees effectively received around 7% depending on step status.
  • 1:00:01 Director of Schools John Mullins said there had been confusion over whether the general employee raise applied to him. He said it did not, because his relationship with the board is governed by contract.
  • 1:00:41 Mullins recounted initially agreeing to take the job at $120,000, turning down a suggestion of $125,000 at the time of hiring.
  • 1:01:30 He said it had bothered him that all employees received raises while he did not, but he asked not to receive a higher percentage increase than district employees.
  • 1:02:07 A $5,000 figure had been budgeted, but Mullins asked that any increase be limited to $4,800, matching a straight 4% raise on $120,000.
  • 1:04:20 Board discussed options of awarding the amount as a raise or as a bonus, noting the money was already budgeted.
  • 1:06:08 Mullins said he would prefer the contract eventually be revised so his compensation automatically follows the same percentage increase as certified teachers unless the board decides otherwise, to avoid repeating this public discussion.
  • 1:07:06 Board cited Scott Bennett / TSBA advice: contract length could not be changed within election-year blackout periods, but compensation could be addressed separately now and the broader contract language could be revisited later.
  • 1:08:40 Some members argued his responsibilities justified more than the employee percentage and that his salary was not high by statewide superintendent standards, but he continued to object to exceeding the employee percentage.
  • 1:10:21 Motion made for a $5,000 contract amendment / raise for 2024–25 despite Mullins’s request for $4,800.
  • 1:10:56 Roll-call vote approved the $5,000 increase.
  • 1:11:21 Board noted a written amendment would need to be brought back for signatures.

Board evaluations 1:11:37

  • 1:11:37 Board noted the director evaluation was included because it must be done by law.
  • 1:11:44 Members suggested the newly elected board should revisit the evaluation instrument because some items still reflected outdated COVID-era concerns.
  • 1:12:30 Board self-evaluations were also included for review, with note that coming board turnover may justify later revision.

Laws and Policies / Board Policy Actions 1:12:47

First-reading TSBA policy updates 1:12:47

  • 1:13:04 Administration presented multiple policy changes driven by the recent legislative session.
  • 1:13:37 Most were revisions to existing policies; one new policy, 4.214, dealt with use of artificial intelligence programs.
  • 1:13:53 Administration said the AI policy area is new and likely to see further changes as guidance develops.
  • 1:14:18 Board was reminded that supporting state public-chapter references could be accessed through TSBA materials.

Discussion on discipline policy and special education 1:15:02

  • 1:15:02 A question was raised about policy 5.307 and whether special-education students remain subject to different disciplinary treatment.
  • 1:15:26 Administration said it depends on whether the student’s disability / exceptionality caused the behavior, referencing manifestation-type analysis for special education.

AI policy concern 1:16:23

  • 1:16:23 Student representative urged that policy 4.214 plainly state that submitting AI-generated work as original work is cheating.
  • 1:16:56 Response was that local teacher/classroom expectations and syllabi may already cover it, but the suggestion was acknowledged for possible follow-up.

Employee concealed-carry law discussion 1:17:51

  • 1:17:51 Administration explained that a new employee concealed-carry law was informational only and did not require a policy change in the packet.
  • 1:18:21 TSBA had recommended consulting the board attorney and district insurer before using the option.
  • 1:18:29 Discussion emphasized that state law places much of the decision-making with local law enforcement, the principal, and the director of schools.
  • 1:19:29 Administration said school safety leadership and the sheriff had discussed it and that teacher carry was not being embraced at this time.
  • 1:20:58 One explanation given was that parents of students in an armed teacher’s classroom might have to be notified and could request reassignment, making the option impractical and not truly concealed in effect.
  • 1:21:58 Motion to approve all revised board policies in section XL1 on first reading; approved without opposition.

Student wellness policy second reading 1:22:16

  • 1:22:24 Board considered second reading of policy 6.411 on student wellness, adding language about caffeinated energy drinks.
  • 1:22:43 Board clarified that “restrict” should mean not selling products such as Red Bull and other highly caffeinated drinks in school cafeterias.
  • 1:23:48 Administration cited a prior incident at Hickman County High School where a student drank seven Kickstart drinks and required an ambulance response.
  • 1:24:06 A member argued “restrict” was too weak and should be changed to “prohibit” to avoid ambiguity.
  • 1:24:29 Motion approved policy 6.411 with the wording revised from “restrict” to “prohibit”; passed without opposition.

Monthly policy review 1:24:46

  • 1:24:55 Board reviewed policies 4.204 to 4.212 as part of routine monthly review.
  • 1:25:03 Motion to approve the review segment; approved without opposition.

Top-10 ranking policy revision 1:25:19

  • 1:25:27 A board member brought forward a revision after community concerns over discussion of eliminating or limiting top-10 rankings.
  • 1:26:05 Proposed revision would require top-10 ranking not just for seniors, but also for high school freshmen, sophomores, and juniors; middle-school inclusion was discussed but not included in the motion.
  • 1:27:08 Drafter explained the revision broadens “top high school seniors” language to “students” and adds a separate section for underclassmen.
  • 1:28:29 Another member urged input from staff, principals, and counselors, saying some preferred to honor more students by GPA thresholds, such as 97 or above, rather than maintaining public top-10 rankings each year.
  • 1:29:40 Supporters responded that the policy would not prevent additional recognition and that top-10 status matters to many families.
  • 1:31:04 Student representative noted Skyward could technically support more up-to-date calculations and suggested including more current senior-year grading data, but administration said class rank is needed by Christmas for college applications.
  • 1:33:39 Administration said principals and counselors support recognizing strong academic performance but prefer top-10 to remain a culminating senior distinction because labels like “10th-grade valedictorian” can create unnecessary pressure and are not true final honors.
  • 1:34:41 Administration acknowledged top-10 recognition is a deeply rooted local tradition.
  • 1:34:57 Motion to approve revised policy on first reading; passed without opposition.

Waiver of student board-member eligibility rule 1:36:36

  • 1:36:36 Board addressed policy 1.26 because incoming student representative Kanan Patel would not yet meet the written requirement to be a current junior or senior when service begins.
  • 1:36:59 Existing policy language required a current Hickman County High School or East Hickman High School student in good standing entering junior or senior year.
  • 1:37:13 Motion made to waive that requirement for Patel because she had already attended the SCOPES conference and would join at the end of the cycle.
  • 1:39:41 Board voted unanimously to waive the requirement.

Civil Rights Report Discussion 1:40:06

  • 1:40:15 The report was separated from consent for fuller discussion.
  • 1:40:46 A member, drawing on corporate HR experience, said the trend data was disturbing and would trigger training review in a private-sector setting.
  • 1:41:45 Reported complaints of harassment, intimidation, bullying, or cyberbullying rose from 47 to 91 year over year.
  • 1:42:17 Concern centered on only 35 cases being confirmed after investigation, leading to questions about whether 56 allegations were dismissed and whether investigative standards were consistent across schools.
  • 1:43:54 The member asked for a future report breaking down the 91 cases by school and showing where claims were confirmed, arguing the board needed more visibility into process and hotspots.
  • 1:45:15 Administration responded that the form is the standard state / federal reporting format and said the district had intentionally built a culture where students and families feel more comfortable reporting concerns.
  • 1:46:30 Administration said complaints were thoroughly investigated and that the increase partly reflects better reporting and a learning curve about what legally counts as bullying.
  • 1:47:56 Board members suggested more training for those investigating complaints to ensure consistency across all eight schools.
  • 1:48:37 Another member pointed to 71 cases resulting in some disciplinary action and argued the data was not simply showing baseless claims.
  • 1:49:43 Discussion clarified that race-based incidents, reported as seven, are a subset within the larger total and that the form itself is easy to misread.
  • 1:51:56 Administration said annual training is already required and provided, but acknowledged some variance in how incidents may have been documented while staff were learning.
  • 1:53:20 The discussion connected school climate to enrollment loss, referencing earlier budget conversations about approximately 600 students not attending district schools; members said parents may choose other options if they perceive safety or bullying problems.
  • 1:55:38 Several members asked for the action plan rather than only the annual totals, while also debating whether school-by-school publication would be appropriate.
  • 1:57:20 Administration identified student cellphone use and image-sharing / AirDrop behavior as a major contributor to harassment issues in high schools.
  • 1:58:27 Transportation behavior was also named as a problem area, with bus misconduct affecting school climate and discipline.
  • 1:59:33 Administration explained that severe bullying cases can lead to 10 or more days of discipline, but many cases used in-school suspension under a stepped process.
  • 2:00:06 Director Mullins said there had been prior direction from central office not to use out-of-school suspension, and he did not necessarily agree with that approach.
  • 2:00:22 He argued the district has too few discipline tools available now: no Saturday school, no after-school detention, and limited alternatives beyond in-school suspension and alternative school.
  • 2:00:48 Discussion suggested about 70 of 71 disciplinary outcomes were in-school suspension, with only one involving out-of-school suspension of 10 days or more.
  • 2:01:18 Mullins reiterated he does not oppose short out-of-school suspensions when behavior warrants it.
  • 2:02:13 Board members argued students who disrupt class or “steal an education” from others need meaningful consequences.
  • 2:02:21 Saturday school was raised as a potentially effective option, though staffing and pay would be obstacles.
  • 2:02:46 Mullins said after-school detention and Saturday school are possible ideas but may require policy changes and administrative recommendations.
  • 2:03:03 He again said long-serving principals had told him they were previously directed not to use out-of-school suspension and that he disagrees with that blanket approach.
  • 2:03:44 Student representative argued in-school suspension is often ineffective, especially at the high school, because repeat offenders treat it as a minor inconvenience and parents may not feel the consequences.
  • 2:05:18 He said alternative school, out-of-school suspension, Saturday school, or after-school detention could create stronger accountability by disrupting the student’s preferred social setting and forcing parent involvement.
  • 2:06:29 A board member with long teaching experience agreed that sending students home can shift responsibility back to parents.
  • 2:07:01 Board appeared to leave the issue for further administrative work and possible policy recommendations next month rather than taking immediate action.

TCAP Data Results and Instructional Focus 2:07:17

  • 2:08:03 Administration reviewed district TCAP / end-of-course performance data comparing last year to this year.
  • 2:08:45 The district improved in 16 of 25 tested categories, or about 64% of categories shown.
  • 2:09:11 Despite that growth, the district remained below the state average in nearly every category, at the state average in three categories, and above it in only one category discussed as third-grade math.
  • 2:09:49 A board member asked whether third-grade success reflected third-grade instruction or stronger teaching in earlier grades; administration credited pre-K through second-grade work feeding into third grade.
  • 2:10:20 Mullins tied family expectations to three goals: students being safe, respected, and learning.
  • 2:10:49 He said both the civil rights report and the achievement data showed the district still had work to do on all three fronts.
  • 2:11:21 Mullins said he sees no reason Hickman County should remain below the state average and framed sustained annual growth as the path forward.
  • 2:12:05 Student representative said the board should focus on growth now and treat state-average comparison as a longer-range goal, suggesting a future student-satisfaction metric to complement discipline and test data.
  • 2:14:41 Board members said the far-right comparison-to-state column is not yet “selling” the district to parents, but credited administration and teachers for significant first-year progress.
  • 2:15:50 Examples mentioned included:
    • Third-grade ELA up 19%
    • Biology up 22%
  • 2:16:34 A member suggested setting a concrete goal for how much of the comparison-to-state column should turn “green” by a target year.
  • 2:17:01 Mullins said a rule of thumb is about 200 children per grade across the district’s intermediate schools; thus a 9% gap could represent moving only about 18 students.
  • 2:17:43 He said the district’s first-year focus was culture, not immediate wholesale instructional overhaul.
  • 2:17:58 To support that, he cited improvement in the statewide teacher survey:
    • 52% teacher participation in 2023
    • Only 5 of 8 schools met the 45% threshold for validity then
    • 88% participation this year
    • 8 of 8 schools with valid survey results this year
  • 2:18:30 One culture indicator, “atmosphere of trust and mutual respect,” reportedly rose from 79% to 93% positive.
  • 2:18:54 Mullins said the district’s coming-year focus will be instruction.
  • 2:21:24 He announced purchase of Planbook, a digital lesson-planning platform that allows administrators to see teacher lesson plans.
  • 2:21:39 Justification: in some cases teachers work hard but teach content not aligned to the actual tested standards.
  • 2:21:57 Administration said a secondary math coach, Shannon Britt, found classes spending time on worthwhile but nonstandard concepts instead of what the state standards and tests require.
  • 2:22:36 Discussion emphasized teacher quality as the strongest school-based factor in student achievement and framed the district’s role as supporting and developing teachers.

Announcements 2:24:25

  • 2:24:25 Fundraiser requests were noted briefly without extended discussion.
  • 2:24:33 Next regular board meeting set for August 5, 2024.
  • 2:24:41 TSBA fall conference in Lewis County noted for August 29; board chair suggested newly elected members may be best positioned to attend.
  • 2:25:21 TSBA annual convention in November was also encouraged.
  • 2:26:01 New county-approved travel reimbursement rates and forms were noted; members were told to use the updated form rather than alter old ones.

Closing Discussion / Teacher concerns 2:26:34

  • 2:26:53 A board member said he had received an email from Sarah Bookers, identified as speaking for the Hickman County Education Association, summarizing constituent concerns.
  • 2:27:49 He said he would share it with board members but not with student representatives.
  • 2:28:45 Mullins responded that if concerns exist, he wants them addressed and said he had checked one matter with a principal who reportedly knew nothing about it; he emphasized chain of command while also acknowledging he had just received the email.
  • 2:29:24 The sender was described as speaking on behalf of the Hickman County Education Association rather than just her own school.
  • 2:30:07 Concerns reportedly included bullying and class size, among other issues.
  • 2:31:11 Board noted there is a new class-size law affecting some areas and said administration may want to examine the email’s concerns in light of recent legal changes.
  • 2:32:23 Meeting moved toward adjournment.

Key figures and statistics

Figure Type Context / topic Timestamp
96 Score / average Freshman student recognized in East Hickman top 10 18:50
9th Rank Corrected freshman top-10 ranking 18:50
1 and 2 Amendment numbers New-year budget amendments approved 23:21
36–41 Amendment numbers Closeout budget amendments reviewed 24:44
$50,400 Expense MasteryConnect quote amount 28:32
$51,000 Expense cap Motion amount approved for Instructure / MasteryConnect 32:21
3 Count MasteryConnect benchmark administrations per year 29:24
95% to 98% Reliability rate Claimed reliability of MasteryConnect 30:58
September Deadline Contract/funding timing for ESSER-supported assessment purchase 31:48
$3,000 per month Revenue Medicaid reimbursement proceeds via Stellar Therapy 34:02
$27,000 to $30,000 Annual revenue Estimated yearly Medicaid reimbursement 34:02
5 Vehicle count Buses declared surplus 35:24
3 Vehicle count White fleet vehicles declared surplus 35:24
18 Age in years Surplus bus 101 age 35:52
224,000 Mileage Surplus bus 101 mileage 35:52
16 Age in years Surplus bus 12 age 36:00
$20,000 Estimated repair cost Engine replacement deemed not worthwhile for bus 12 36:00
16 Age in years Surplus bus 31 age 36:07
30,000 Mileage Bus 31 had under this mileage despite engine issues 36:07
122,000 Mileage Surplus bus 33 mileage 36:25
17 Age in years Surplus bus 65 age 36:34
$85 an hour Contract rate Sidekick Therapy Partners speech services 38:23
6 School count Lower schools with no regular fees 40:36
$10 Fee Parking fee discussed for both high schools 42:25
10 years Time period Approximate parking-lot striping cycle 42:41
$100 Fee Cosmetology fee confirmed for high schools 44:18
12 Meeting count Approximate Discipline Hearing Authority meetings last year 46:02
6 Appeal count Approximate number of appeals tied to one vaping incident 46:02
180 days Discipline duration Long alternative-school assignment described as excessive 46:51
25% Percentage Share of a high school career represented by 180 days 47:05
50 days Discipline duration Longest alternative-school assignment said to be used in Dickson 47:16
50% Threshold Point at which district began considering students for reintegration from alternative school 47:31
12 Student count Approximate students returned early from alternative placement 47:48
1 Recidivism count Known student who reoffended after early return 47:48
1 year Waiting period Prior bus-driver insurance wait 50:27
3 Route count Vacant bus routes 51:21
4 hours a day Work schedule Typical bus-driver daily hours cited in insurance discussion 50:50
4 or 5 Applicant count People said to be in the bus-driver pipeline 53:40
8:30–8:35 Time Late student arrival time due to double routes 54:13
30 minutes Instruction time Math class time missed due to late bus arrivals 54:21
2:25 Time Early departure time for some students due to double routes 54:35
$7,900 Benefit cost Approximate annual employer health-insurance cost per employee 55:49
$23,700 Benefit cost Approximate insurance cost for three new bus-driver hires 56:13
4% Raise percentage General employee raise referenced in director salary discussion 1:00:09
$120,000 Salary Director’s originally accepted salary 1:00:41
$125,000 Salary figure Hiring-stage salary figure director said he declined 1:00:50
$5,000 Raise amount Budgeted and approved director raise 1:02:07
$4,800 Raise amount Director’s requested raise to match exact 4% 1:03:34
7% Estimated compensation increase Approximate raise-plus-step effect for some employees 1:02:44
2024–25 Fiscal / contract year Director raise applies to this year 1:10:48
4.214 Policy number New AI policy discussed 1:14:02
5.307 Policy number Discipline policy discussed regarding teachers/employees and special education 1:15:02
6.411 Policy number Student wellness policy amended on second reading 1:24:29
7 Drink count Number of Kickstart drinks in prior student incident prompting wellness concern 1:23:48
4.204 to 4.212 Policy range Monthly policy review items 1:24:55
97 GPA threshold Example of alternative recognition suggestion for high achievers 1:29:23
1.26 Policy number Student board-member eligibility waiver 1:36:36
47 Incident count Prior-year total complaints of harassment/intimidation/bullying/cyberbullying 1:41:45
91 Incident count Current-year total complaints of harassment/intimidation/bullying/cyberbullying 1:41:45
35 Incident count Confirmed bullying-related cases after investigation 1:42:17
56 Incident count Difference between reported and confirmed cases raised in questioning 1:42:17
24 of 31 Incident count Earlier-year comparison cited in trend discussion 1:42:35
27 of 33 Incident count Earlier-year comparison cited in trend discussion 1:42:44
71 Incident count Cases resulting in some disciplinary action 1:45:15
8 School count Number of schools where consistency/training was discussed 1:47:56
7 Incident count Race-based incidents discussed as subset of the 91 1:49:01
600 Enrollment count Approximate students not attending district schools, referenced in discussion 1:53:20
70 of 71 Discipline count Cases said to result in in-school suspension 2:00:48
1 Discipline count Cases said to involve out-of-school suspension of 10+ days 2:00:48
16 of 25 Category count Tested categories showing improvement 2:08:45
64% Percentage Share of tested categories showing improvement 2:08:45
3 Category count Categories said to be at the state average 2:09:18
1 Category count Category said to be above state average 2:09:26
19% Score increase Third-grade ELA improvement cited in discussion 2:15:50
22% Score increase Biology improvement cited in discussion 2:15:58
200 Student count Approximate students per grade across key schools 2:17:01
9% Percentage gap Example gap to state average used to illustrate needed student movement 2:17:18
18 Student count Approximate number of students represented by a 9% shift 2:17:18
52% Survey participation Teacher survey participation in 2023 2:17:58
5 of 8 School count Schools meeting teacher-survey validity threshold in 2023 2:18:06
45% Threshold Minimum faculty participation for survey validity 2:18:06
88% Survey participation Teacher survey participation this year 2:18:15
8 of 8 School count Schools with valid teacher-survey results this year 2:18:23
79% Survey result Prior trust/mutual-respect result 2:18:30
93% Survey result Current trust/mutual-respect result 2:18:38
August 5, 2024 Date Next regular board meeting 2:24:33
August 29 Date TSBA fall conference in Lewis County 2:24:41
November Date TSBA annual convention 2:25:21

External vendors, brands, and software

Name Type Context / topic Timestamp
HOSA Brand Student-recognition discussion referencing extracurricular participation 18:50
Instructure Company ESSER-funded payment vendor for MasteryConnect assessment platform 32:12
MasteryConnect Software Benchmark / practice-testing system approved for district use 28:32
Stellar Therapy Services LLC Company Medicaid reimbursement services for student skilled nursing 33:05
International Brand Bus engine brand referenced in surplus discussion 36:16
Sidekick Therapy Partners Company Contract for speech-language therapy services 37:29
TSBA Company Policy guidance, contract guidance, conferences, and legislative materials 58:50
Scott Bennett Individual TSBA-associated legal/contract guidance cited in director salary discussion 1:07:06
Red Bull Brand Example of caffeinated energy drink affected by wellness policy 1:22:51
Skyward Software Student grading/ranking system referenced in top-10 policy discussion 1:31:04
AirDrop Software Phone-sharing function cited in bullying/cellphone discussion 1:57:20
Planbook Software Digital lesson-planning platform purchased for instructional oversight 2:21:24
Shannon Britt Individual Secondary math coach referenced in standards-alignment discussion 2:21:57
Kickstart Brand Energy drink in prior student medical incident 1:23:48

Personnel changes

Name Role / office Change Context / topic Timestamp
John Mullins Director of Schools Contract amended / salary increased Board approved $5,000 raise for 2024–25; written amendment to follow 1:10:48

Laws and policies

Citation / name Level Type Context / topic Timestamp
Policy 1.26 School Policy Student board-member eligibility requirement waived for incoming representative not yet a junior/senior 16:29
Policy 4.214 School Policy New AI-use policy; discussion included whether AI-generated student work should explicitly count as cheating 1:14:02
Policy 5.307 School Policy Discipline-related policy discussed with respect to teachers/employees and special-education manifestation issues 1:15:02
Employee concealed-carry law State Law Informational update; district not pursuing teacher carry at this time 1:17:51
Policy 6.411 School Policy Student wellness policy amended to prohibit cafeteria sale of highly caffeinated energy drinks 1:24:29
Policies 4.204 to 4.212 School Policy Monthly policy review segment approved 1:24:55
Public chapters from the legislative session State Law TSBA-driven policy revisions based on recent state legislative changes 1:13:04
Tennessee law on vaping / juvenile consequences State Law Vaping incident discussed as also resulting in juvenile-court consequences 48:55
Federal civil rights / bullying reporting form Federal Regulation Standard reporting format used for annual civil-rights complaint reporting 1:50:21
Class-size law State Law Mentioned in connection with teacher concerns and possible limits on district response 2:31:11